Shaping and Reshaping the Caribbean
The Work of Aimé Césaire and René Depestre
Martin Munro
Click cover to enlarge Buy paperback at: | MHRA Texts and Dissertations 52 Maney Publishing for the Modern Humanities Research Association 1 January 2000 • 274pp ISBN: 978-1-902653-29-7 (paperback) • RRP £25, $40 The current drive in Caribbean literary studies stresses similarities and points of convergence between the various islands of the archipelago and their authors, the fundamental aim of which is to move closer to an all-encompassing theory of Caribbeanness. Martin Munro challenges this movement, and through a study of the work of Aimé Césaire and René Depestre, proposes an alternative vision of the present and future of Caribbean literature. The main areas of inquiry are: how these two Caribbean writers construct their sense of themselves; how they relate to the Caribbean and to the wider world; and how they have been influenced by the historical and cultural particularities of their respective islands. Aimé Césaire's sense of self and of the Caribbean is essentially shaped around the circuit triangulaire, the model of Africa/Europe/Caribbean interdependencies, ultimately inherited from the time of the slave trade. Munro shows how Césaire views the Caribbean as a deeply traumatic, insubstantial space; how he looks to Africa for his lost sense of self; and how Europe is seen at once as the malevolent colonial power and also the home of poetry and learning. René Depestre's Caribbean 'shape' is quite different: Africa is relatively absent in Depestre's work; Europe is not presented as a threat; and Depestre, unlike Césaire, sees in the Caribbean an energy and a creativity brought about by the historical fusion of disparate cultures. An important factor in 'shaping' Depestre's model of Caribbeanness is his long exile from Haiti, and Depestre's experience of exile is analysed in detail. The combination of broad contextualization, diverse theoretical approaches, and close analysis of these important writers' work, produces a strong argument against attempts to view and read writing from the Caribbean as one literature. Difference and diversity, it is argued, predominate as Caribbean writing embraces the new century, and the whole notion of Caribbeanness undergoes further processes of highly creative splintering and reshaping. Bibliography entry: Munro, Martin, Shaping and Reshaping the Caribbean: The Work of Aimé Césaire and René Depestre, MHRA Texts and Dissertations, 52 (MHRA, 2000) First footnote reference: 35 Martin Munro, Shaping and Reshaping the Caribbean: The Work of Aimé Césaire and René Depestre, MHRA Texts and Dissertations, 52 (MHRA, 2000), p. 21. Subsequent footnote reference: 37 Munro, p. 47. (To see how these citations were worked out, follow this link.) Bibliography entry: Munro, Martin. 2000. Shaping and Reshaping the Caribbean: The Work of Aimé Césaire and René Depestre, MHRA Texts and Dissertations, 52 (MHRA) Example citation: ‘A quotation occurring on page 21 of this work’ (Munro 2000: 21). Example footnote reference: 35 Munro 2000: 21. (To see how these citations were worked out, follow this link.) This title was first published by Maney Publishing for the Modern Humanities Research Association but rights to it are now held by Modern Humanities Research Association. This title is now out of print. Permanent link to this title: www.mhra.org.uk/publications/Shaping-Reshaping-Caribbean www.mhra.org.uk/publications/td-52 |