Conclusion
Philip Cavendish
From Mining for Jewels: Evgenii Zamiatin and the Literary Stylization of Rus' (2000), pp. 243-49, doi:10.59860/td.c6c09b0
Click cover to enlarge
| Part of the book: Mining for Jewels Philip Cavendish MHRA Texts and Dissertations 51 Maney Publishing for the Modern Humanities Research Association Abstract. Irreconcilable and conflicting elements lie at the very heart of Zamiatin's writing. He was an agnostic who encouraged his students to study the ecclesiastical literature of antiquity; a modernist who delved deep into the ancient strata of the language in order to give his prose muscularity, durability, and exoticism; and an intellectual who succeeded in evoking the life and language of the folk with tremendous resonance, and yet at the same time with an almost patrician sense of irony and humour. Unlike his Populist predecessors, Zamiatin refused to idealize the peasant; and it was precisely the mercilessness of his gaze which caused Marxist critics after the Revolution, wrongly in my view, to accuse him of reactionary sympathies. Such attacks, which were politically motivated rather than honestly felt, confused moral imperative with cynicism and a sense of superiority, and it can only be hoped that now scholars are free to engage with Zamiatin's work in an independent way this aspect of his fiction will receive due recognition. Full text. This contribution is published as Open Access and can be downloaded as a PDF, or viewed as a PDF in your web browser, here: |




