MHRA Style Citation Demonstration
Click cover to enlarge | According to the MHRA Style Guide, this item should be cited in a bibliography as follows: Raser, Timothy, Baudelaire and Photography: Finding the Painter of Modern Life, Research Monographs in French Studies, 45 (Cambridge: Legenda, 2015) This is how standard MHRA style would look. Some of its book series (notably Legenda) allow an alternative citation system called 'author-date', but please talk to your editor before using it. (To see the demonstration for author-date, follow this link.) Let's take this bibliography entry one step at a time: Step 1. The entry begins with the author(s) or editor(s) of the volume, with the first name inverted into Surname, Forename. This is because a Bibliography is a list in surname order, so we need a surname up front. Raser, Timothy Step 2. Now a comma, not a full stop: Raser, Timothy, Step 3. Here we have the book's title, in italics, not quotation marks. Raser, Timothy, Baudelaire and Photography: Finding the Painter of Modern Life Step 4. This book belongs to a series, so we'll name that. If the series is numbered, we give the number, too. No italics, no quotation marks in the series name. Raser, Timothy, Baudelaire and Photography: Finding the Painter of Modern Life, Research Monographs in French Studies, 45 Step 5. Since this is a book, not a journal issue, we have to identify its source, in round brackets. First, place of publication. This can be ambiguous. Legenda may be edited in Oxford, but the registered address of MHRA, which owns Legenda, is in Cambridge. Raser, Timothy, Baudelaire and Photography: Finding the Painter of Modern Life, Research Monographs in French Studies, 45 (Cambridge Step 6. Now a colon, a space, and the publisher's name. Here that's Legenda because this is the imprint name under which the book is published, even though Legenda is not strictly speaking a company. To decide these things, one must look at the exact wording of the preliminary pages. Our preference is for Legenda books to be cited as 'Legenda', and we word our preliminaries with that aim. Raser, Timothy, Baudelaire and Photography: Finding the Painter of Modern Life, Research Monographs in French Studies, 45 (Cambridge: Legenda Step 7. Then the year of first publication, and we're done with the bracketed part. Raser, Timothy, Baudelaire and Photography: Finding the Painter of Modern Life, Research Monographs in French Studies, 45 (Cambridge: Legenda, 2015) And that's the finished bibliography entry. Note that there's no final full stop. So how about citations in footnotes or endnotes? In standard MHRA style, the first time the work is cited in a note, it should be cited in full. This looks very like a Bibliography entry, but:
Suppose we want to cite a passage on pages 24 to 27: 34 See Timothy Raser, Baudelaire and Photography: Finding the Painter of Modern Life, Research Monographs in French Studies, 45 (Cambridge: Legenda, 2015), pp. 24-27. But in any subsequent notes, a heavily abbreviated form is used: 37 Compare Raser, p. 17. |