Medea — simply to mention her name conjures up echoes and cross-connections from Antiquity to the present. The vengeful wife, the infanticidal mother, the frail, suicidal heroine, the archetypal bad mother, the smitten maiden, the barbarian, the sorceress, the abused victim, the case study for a pathology: for more than two thousand years she has challenged in literature, arrested the eye in paintings, reverberated in music, called to us from the stage. She demands the most interdisciplinary of study, from ancient art to contemporary law, genetics and medicine: she is no more to be bound by any single field of study than by any single take on her character.
To see how to cite this article in standard MHRA style, follow this link.
To see how to cite this article in author-date MHRA style, follow this link.
Bibliography entry:
Bartel, Heike, and Anne Simon (eds), Unbinding Medea: Interdisciplinary Approaches to a Classical Myth from Antiquity to the 21st Century (Legenda, 2010)
First footnote reference:35Unbinding Medea: Interdisciplinary Approaches to a Classical Myth from Antiquity to the 21st Century, ed. by Heike Bartel and Anne Simon (Legenda, 2010), p. 21.
Subsequent footnote reference:37 Bartel and Simon, p. 47.
Bartel, Heike, and Anne Simon (eds). 2010. Unbinding Medea: Interdisciplinary Approaches to a Classical Myth from Antiquity to the 21st Century (Legenda)
Example citation: ‘A quotation occurring on page 21 of this work’ (Bartel and Simon 2010: 21).
Example footnote reference:35 Bartel and Simon 2010: 21.
This Legenda title was first published by Modern Humanities Research Association and Maney Publishing but rights to it are now held by Modern Humanities Research Association and Routledge.
Routledge distributes this title on behalf on Legenda. You can search for it at their site by following this link.