Quevedo on Parnassus 
Allusive Context and Literary Theory in the Love-Lyric

Paul Julian Smith

 Open access under:
CC BY-NC 4.0
CC BY-NC 4.0 logo

MHRA Texts and Dissertations 25

Modern Humanities Research Association

1 January 1987

ISBN: 978-1-123145-29-8 (Google ebook)  •  RRP £4.95

ISBN: 978-1-839546-62-4 (Hosted on this website)

Sample: Google Books  •  Open Access with doi: 10.59860/td.b6b1afa

RenaissanceSpanishPoetryopen


Quevedo, who for much of his life was a nobleman politically active at court, is now remembered as one of the great writers of the Baroque era. His love poems are among the best regarded from his substantial poetic oeuvre, but he ranges also over metaphysics, mythology and satire, and there are frequent references or allusions to his deep reading from numerous languages.

This book, originally published in paperback in 1987 under the ISBN 978-0-947623-12-8, was made Open Access in 2024 as part of the MHRA Revivals programme.

Contents:

i-xi, 1-209

Quevedo on Parnassus: Allusive Context and Literary Theory in the Love-Lyric
Paul Julian Smith
Complete volume as single PDF

The complete text of this book.

Read
i-xi

Quevedo on Parnassus: front matter
Paul Julian Smith
doi:10.59860/td.c7be831

Contents, Preface, Abbreviations and References.

Read
Cite
1-3

Introduction
Paul Julian Smith
doi:10.59860/td.c8cdc6e

Francisco de Quevedo (1580-1645) is one of the most celebrated and most prolific authors ever to write in the Spanish language. Perhaps best known for his picaresque novel, El Buscón, and his satirical fantasies, Los sueños, he also composed over a thousand poems in all possible genres. The love-lyric, highly esteemed for several decades, has only recently begun to receive the attention it merits. The diversity of Quevedo's poetic production is matched only by the variety of approaches adopted by critics to the texts themselves: psychological, ideological, semiotic.

Read
Cite
4-23

Chapter 1: Allusive Context and Critical Perspective
Paul Julian Smith
doi:10.59860/td.c053a35

I. Allusive context: proposition. II. Critical perspective: a survey. III. The citational mode. IV. The topos. V. Literary culture and erudition. VI. Quellensforschung. VII. Textual authority and poetic voice.

Read
Cite
24-53

Chapter 2: Literary Theory and Quevedo
Paul Julian Smith
doi:10.59860/td.c162e7c

I. Literary theory: proposition. II. Rhetoric: argument and ornament; audience and ethics. III. Dialectic: categories and places; Ramus and Tasso. IV. Poetics: theory and practice; diction and clarity. V. Wit: rhetoric, dialectic, poetics. VI. Quevedo's literary theory: texts and problems. VII. The letter to the Conde-Duque (1629).

Read
Cite
54-89

Chapter 3: Rhetoric and the Lady: 'Celebración de Hermosuras'
Paul Julian Smith
doi:10.59860/td.c27225f

I. Allusion, theory, and the lady. II. Judgement and deliberation. III. Praise. IV. The courtly topos: Flori and Aminta. V. The abstracted mistress: Lisi. VI. A rhetorical exegesis: 'En crespa tempestad del oro undoso'. VII. Feminine pintura: 'En breve cárcel traigo aprisionado'.

Read
Cite
90-139

Chapter 4: Dialectic in Love and Nature: 'Afectos Propios y Comunes del Amor'
Paul Julian Smith
doi:10.59860/td.c3816a6

I. The dialectical trace. II. Iconography and opsis. III. Definition and contraries. IV. Invective and decorum. V. Description and apostrophe. VI. Exemplum and interpretation.

Read
Cite
140-75

Chapter 5: The Poetics of Hero and Lover: 'Particulares de Famosos Enamorados'
Paul Julian Smith
doi:10.59860/td.c490aed

I. Poetics, wit, and myth. II. Clarity and difficulty. III. Poet and persona. IV. Species and enthymeme. V. The poetic monument.

Read
Cite
176-77

Conclusion
Paul Julian Smith
doi:10.59860/td.c59fb4c

We may replace the erroneous 'modern' virtues for which Quevedo has been praised (tension, ambiguity) with three virtues which he himself would have understood, corresponding to the three disciplines from which I have drawn my critical vocabulary. The persuasive force of rhetoric is expressed in copia, the inexhaustible capacity for the multiple elaboration of a severely-restricted repertoire of themes. The discriminatory bias of dialectic registers as economy, the elimination of all that is extraneous to necessary argument. The heightened imitative capacity of poetics results in clarity, the graphic foregrounding of word and image.

Read
Cite
178-209

Quevedo on Parnassus: end matter
Paul Julian Smith
doi:10.59860/td.c6968f3

Notes; Bibliographical Note; Bibliography; Index Of Poems Examined; General Index.

Read
Cite

Bibliography entry:

Smith, Paul Julian, Quevedo on Parnassus: Allusive Context and Literary Theory in the Love-Lyric, MHRA Texts and Dissertations, 25 (MHRA, 1987)

First footnote reference: 35 Paul Julian Smith, Quevedo on Parnassus: Allusive Context and Literary Theory in the Love-Lyric, MHRA Texts and Dissertations, 25 (MHRA, 1987), p. 21.

Subsequent footnote reference: 37 Smith, p. 47.

(To see how these citations were worked out, follow this link.)

Bibliography entry:

Smith, Paul Julian. 1987. Quevedo on Parnassus: Allusive Context and Literary Theory in the Love-Lyric, MHRA Texts and Dissertations, 25 (MHRA)

Example citation: ‘A quotation occurring on page 21 of this work’ (Smith 1987: 21).

Example footnote reference: 35 Smith 1987: 21.

(To see how these citations were worked out, follow this link.)


This title is distributed on behalf of MHRA by Ingram’s. Booksellers and libraries can order direct from Ingram by setting up an ipage Account: click here for more.


Permanent link to this title: