According to the MHRA Style Guide, this item should be cited in a bibliography as follows:

Sacchini, Lorenzo, ‘Utile dulci in Sixteenth-Century Readings of the Canzoniere.: Ethical Issues in Academic Lectures on Petrarch’, in Petrarch Commentary and Exegesis in Renaissance Italy and Beyond: Materiality, Paratexts and Interpretative Strategies, ed. by Guyda Armstrong, Simon A. Gilson and Federica Pich, Italian Perspectives, 56 (Legenda, 2023), pp. 141–60, doi:10.2307/jj.667671.13

This is how standard MHRA style would look. Some of its book series (notably Legenda) allow an alternative citation system called 'author-date', but please talk to your editor before using it. (To see the demonstration for author-date, follow this link.)

Let's take this bibliography entry one step at a time:

Step 1. We start with the name(s) of the author(s) of the article, inverting the first name into the form 'Forename, Surname'.

Sacchini, Lorenzo

Step 2. This is regular MHRA style, so the name's followed by a comma.

Sacchini, Lorenzo,

Step 3. Now we add the title, in single inverted commas. Any single quotation marks already in the title must be converted to doubles.

Sacchini, Lorenzo, ‘Utile dulci in Sixteenth-Century Readings of the Canzoniere.: Ethical Issues in Academic Lectures on Petrarch’

Step 4. We have to say where this comes from, so:

Sacchini, Lorenzo, ‘Utile dulci in Sixteenth-Century Readings of the Canzoniere.: Ethical Issues in Academic Lectures on Petrarch’, in

Step 5. Next we identify where the article is to be found, using italics, not quotation marks, for the volume title.

Sacchini, Lorenzo, ‘Utile dulci in Sixteenth-Century Readings of the Canzoniere.: Ethical Issues in Academic Lectures on Petrarch’, in Petrarch Commentary and Exegesis in Renaissance Italy and Beyond: Materiality, Paratexts and Interpretative Strategies

Step 6. After the title come any editors or translators. It's 'ed. by', not 'ed by', because although 'ed.' abbreviates 'edited', we regard the 'd' as the second letter of 'edited', not the last: so the abbreviation doesn't contain the last letter, and thus must have a full stop '.'

Sacchini, Lorenzo, ‘Utile dulci in Sixteenth-Century Readings of the Canzoniere.: Ethical Issues in Academic Lectures on Petrarch’, in Petrarch Commentary and Exegesis in Renaissance Italy and Beyond: Materiality, Paratexts and Interpretative Strategies, ed. by Guyda Armstrong, Simon A. Gilson and Federica Pich

Step 7. This book belongs to a series, so we'll name that. If the series is numbered, we give the number, too. No italics, no quotation marks in the series name.

Sacchini, Lorenzo, ‘Utile dulci in Sixteenth-Century Readings of the Canzoniere.: Ethical Issues in Academic Lectures on Petrarch’, in Petrarch Commentary and Exegesis in Renaissance Italy and Beyond: Materiality, Paratexts and Interpretative Strategies, ed. by Guyda Armstrong, Simon A. Gilson and Federica Pich, Italian Perspectives, 56

Step 8. Since this is a book, not a journal issue, we have to identify its source, in round brackets. Until 2024, MHRA style required a place of publication - for example, New York or Oxford. This is no longer given except in special circumstances.

Sacchini, Lorenzo, ‘Utile dulci in Sixteenth-Century Readings of the Canzoniere.: Ethical Issues in Academic Lectures on Petrarch’, in Petrarch Commentary and Exegesis in Renaissance Italy and Beyond: Materiality, Paratexts and Interpretative Strategies, ed. by Guyda Armstrong, Simon A. Gilson and Federica Pich, Italian Perspectives, 56 (

Step 9. Now a colon, a space, and the publisher's name. Here that's Legenda because this is the imprint name under which the book is published, even though Legenda is not strictly speaking a company. To decide these things, one must look at the exact wording of the preliminary pages. Our preference is for Legenda books to be cited as 'Legenda', and we word our preliminaries with that aim.

Sacchini, Lorenzo, ‘Utile dulci in Sixteenth-Century Readings of the Canzoniere.: Ethical Issues in Academic Lectures on Petrarch’, in Petrarch Commentary and Exegesis in Renaissance Italy and Beyond: Materiality, Paratexts and Interpretative Strategies, ed. by Guyda Armstrong, Simon A. Gilson and Federica Pich, Italian Perspectives, 56 (Legenda

Step 10. Then the year of first publication, and we're done with the bracketed part.

Sacchini, Lorenzo, ‘Utile dulci in Sixteenth-Century Readings of the Canzoniere.: Ethical Issues in Academic Lectures on Petrarch’, in Petrarch Commentary and Exegesis in Renaissance Italy and Beyond: Materiality, Paratexts and Interpretative Strategies, ed. by Guyda Armstrong, Simon A. Gilson and Federica Pich, Italian Perspectives, 56 (Legenda, 2023)

Step 11. Now the pagination. And we use 'p.' or 'pp.' as appropriate. Number ranges are elided in the last two digits: thus '2234-2265' should be '2234-65', and '102-109' should be '102-09'.

Sacchini, Lorenzo, ‘Utile dulci in Sixteenth-Century Readings of the Canzoniere.: Ethical Issues in Academic Lectures on Petrarch’, in Petrarch Commentary and Exegesis in Renaissance Italy and Beyond: Materiality, Paratexts and Interpretative Strategies, ed. by Guyda Armstrong, Simon A. Gilson and Federica Pich, Italian Perspectives, 56 (Legenda, 2023), pp. 141–60

Step 12. This contribution has a DOI, so the Fourth Edition Guide (2024) requires us to quote it, like so.

Sacchini, Lorenzo, ‘Utile dulci in Sixteenth-Century Readings of the Canzoniere.: Ethical Issues in Academic Lectures on Petrarch’, in Petrarch Commentary and Exegesis in Renaissance Italy and Beyond: Materiality, Paratexts and Interpretative Strategies, ed. by Guyda Armstrong, Simon A. Gilson and Federica Pich, Italian Perspectives, 56 (Legenda, 2023), pp. 141–60, doi:10.2307/jj.667671.13

And that's the finished bibliography entry. Note that there's no final full stop.

So how about citations in footnotes or endnotes?

In standard MHRA style, the first time the work is cited in a note, it should be cited in full. This looks very like a Bibliography entry, but:

• The author's name doesn't always come first: only for monographs. For collections and editions, the title comes first.
• Even if the author's name does come first, it's back to being the right way round, so it's Forename Surname, not Surname, Forename;
• Unlike Bibliography entries, notes are punctuated as sentences, and usually end in full stops.

Suppose we want to cite a passage on pages 24 to 27:

³⁴ See Lorenzo Sacchini, ‘Utile dulci in Sixteenth-Century Readings of the Canzoniere.: Ethical Issues in Academic Lectures on Petrarch’, in Petrarch Commentary and Exegesis in Renaissance Italy and Beyond: Materiality, Paratexts and Interpretative Strategies, ed. by Guyda Armstrong, Simon A. Gilson and Federica Pich, Italian Perspectives, 56 (Legenda, 2023), pp. 141–60, doi:10.2307/jj.667671.13, pp. 24-27.

But in any subsequent notes, a heavily abbreviated form is used:

³⁷ Compare Sacchini, p. 17.