MHRA Style Citation Demonstration

According to the MHRA Style Guide, this item should be cited in a bibliography as follows:

Britton, Celia, ‘Chapter 6 Being-in-Common and Relation: the Idea of Community in the Work of Jean-Luc Nancy and Édouard Glissant’, in Perspectives on Culture and Politics in the French Antilles, celia Britton, Selected Essays, 4 (Legenda, 2018), pp. 64–75, doi:10.2307/j.ctv16km0fp.11

This is how standard MHRA style would look. Some of its book series (notably Legenda) allow an alternative citation system called 'author-date', but please talk to your editor before using it. (To see the demonstration for author-date, follow this link.)

Let's take this bibliography entry one step at a time:

Step 1. We start with the name(s) of the author(s) of the article, inverting the first name into the form 'Forename, Surname'.

Britton, Celia

Step 2. This is regular MHRA style, so the name's followed by a comma.

Britton, Celia,

Step 3. Now we add the title, in single inverted commas. Any single quotation marks already in the title must be converted to doubles.

Britton, Celia, ‘Chapter 6 Being-in-Common and Relation: the Idea of Community in the Work of Jean-Luc Nancy and Édouard Glissant’

Step 4. We have to say where this comes from, so:

Britton, Celia, ‘Chapter 6 Being-in-Common and Relation: the Idea of Community in the Work of Jean-Luc Nancy and Édouard Glissant’, in

Step 5. Next we identify where the article is to be found, using italics, not quotation marks, for the volume title.

Britton, Celia, ‘Chapter 6 Being-in-Common and Relation: the Idea of Community in the Work of Jean-Luc Nancy and Édouard Glissant’, in Perspectives on Culture and Politics in the French Antilles

Step 6. After the title come any editors or translators.

Britton, Celia, ‘Chapter 6 Being-in-Common and Relation: the Idea of Community in the Work of Jean-Luc Nancy and Édouard Glissant’, in Perspectives on Culture and Politics in the French Antilles, celia Britton

Step 7. This book belongs to a series, so we'll name that. If the series is numbered, we give the number, too. No italics, no quotation marks in the series name.

Britton, Celia, ‘Chapter 6 Being-in-Common and Relation: the Idea of Community in the Work of Jean-Luc Nancy and Édouard Glissant’, in Perspectives on Culture and Politics in the French Antilles, celia Britton, Selected Essays, 4

Step 8. Since this is a book, not a journal issue, we have to identify its source, in round brackets. Until 2024, MHRA style required a place of publication - for example, New York or Oxford. This is no longer given except in special circumstances.

Britton, Celia, ‘Chapter 6 Being-in-Common and Relation: the Idea of Community in the Work of Jean-Luc Nancy and Édouard Glissant’, in Perspectives on Culture and Politics in the French Antilles, celia Britton, Selected Essays, 4 (

Step 9. Now a colon, a space, and the publisher's name. Here that's Legenda because this is the imprint name under which the book is published, even though Legenda is not strictly speaking a company. To decide these things, one must look at the exact wording of the preliminary pages. Our preference is for Legenda books to be cited as 'Legenda', and we word our preliminaries with that aim.

Britton, Celia, ‘Chapter 6 Being-in-Common and Relation: the Idea of Community in the Work of Jean-Luc Nancy and Édouard Glissant’, in Perspectives on Culture and Politics in the French Antilles, celia Britton, Selected Essays, 4 (Legenda

Step 10. Then the year of first publication, and we're done with the bracketed part.

Britton, Celia, ‘Chapter 6 Being-in-Common and Relation: the Idea of Community in the Work of Jean-Luc Nancy and Édouard Glissant’, in Perspectives on Culture and Politics in the French Antilles, celia Britton, Selected Essays, 4 (Legenda, 2018)

Step 11. Now the pagination. And we use 'p.' or 'pp.' as appropriate. Number ranges are elided in the last two digits: thus '2234-2265' should be '2234-65', and '102-109' should be '102-09'.

Britton, Celia, ‘Chapter 6 Being-in-Common and Relation: the Idea of Community in the Work of Jean-Luc Nancy and Édouard Glissant’, in Perspectives on Culture and Politics in the French Antilles, celia Britton, Selected Essays, 4 (Legenda, 2018), pp. 64–75

Step 12. This contribution has a DOI, so the Fourth Edition Guide (2024) requires us to quote it, like so.

Britton, Celia, ‘Chapter 6 Being-in-Common and Relation: the Idea of Community in the Work of Jean-Luc Nancy and Édouard Glissant’, in Perspectives on Culture and Politics in the French Antilles, celia Britton, Selected Essays, 4 (Legenda, 2018), pp. 64–75, doi:10.2307/j.ctv16km0fp.11

And that's the finished bibliography entry. Note that there's no final full stop.

So how about citations in footnotes or endnotes?

In standard MHRA style, the first time the work is cited in a note, it should be cited in full. This looks very like a Bibliography entry, but:

  • The author's name doesn't always come first: only for monographs. For collections and editions, the title comes first.
  • Even if the author's name does come first, it's back to being the right way round, so it's Forename Surname, not Surname, Forename;
  • Unlike Bibliography entries, notes are punctuated as sentences, and usually end in full stops.

Suppose we want to cite a passage on pages 24 to 27:

34 See Celia Britton, ‘Chapter 6 Being-in-Common and Relation: the Idea of Community in the Work of Jean-Luc Nancy and Édouard Glissant’, in Perspectives on Culture and Politics in the French Antilles, celia Britton, Selected Essays, 4 (Legenda, 2018), pp. 64–75, doi:10.2307/j.ctv16km0fp.11, pp. 24-27.

But in any subsequent notes, a heavily abbreviated form is used:

37 Compare Britton, p. 17.