MHRA Style Citation Demonstration

According to the MHRA Style Guide, this item should be cited in a bibliography as follows:

Boyd, Stephen. 2019. Introduction to , in The Art of Cervantes in Don Quixote: Critical Essays, ed. by Stephen Boyd, Trudi L. Darby and Terence O'Reilly, Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Cultures, 27 (Cambridge: Legenda), pp. 1–8

This is in the author-date variant of MHRA style. MHRA's journals don't allow author-date citation, but some of its book series (notably Legenda) do: please talk to your editor before using this. (To see the demonstration for regular style instead, follow this link.)

Let's take this bibliography entry one step at a time:

Step 1. We start with the name(s) of the author(s) of the article, inverting the first name into the form 'Forename, Surname'.

Boyd, Stephen

Step 2. In author-date style, we have a full stop, then the year, then another full stop. If there are multiple entries with the same author and year, letters would be used to distinguish them: e.g., Bloggs 1994a, Bloggs 1994b.

Boyd, Stephen. 2019.

Step 3. Now we add the title, in single inverted commas. Any single quotation marks already in the title must be converted to doubles.

Boyd, Stephen. 2019. Introduction to

Step 4. We have to say where this comes from, so:

Boyd, Stephen. 2019. Introduction to , in

Step 5. Next we identify where the article is to be found, using italics, not quotation marks, for the volume title.

Boyd, Stephen. 2019. Introduction to , in The Art of Cervantes in Don Quixote: Critical Essays

Step 6. After the title come any editors or translators. It's 'ed. by', not 'ed by', because although 'ed.' abbreviates 'edited', we regard the 'd' as the second letter of 'edited', not the last: so the abbreviation doesn't contain the last letter, and thus must have a full stop '.'

Boyd, Stephen. 2019. Introduction to , in The Art of Cervantes in Don Quixote: Critical Essays, ed. by Stephen Boyd, Trudi L. Darby and Terence O'Reilly

Step 7. This book belongs to a series, so we'll name that. If the series is numbered, we give the number, too. No italics, no quotation marks in the series name.

Boyd, Stephen. 2019. Introduction to , in The Art of Cervantes in Don Quixote: Critical Essays, ed. by Stephen Boyd, Trudi L. Darby and Terence O'Reilly, Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Cultures, 27

Step 8. Since this is a book, not a journal issue, we have to identify its source, in round brackets. First, place of publication. This can be ambiguous. Legenda may be edited in Oxford, but the registered address of MHRA, which owns Legenda, is in Cambridge.

Boyd, Stephen. 2019. Introduction to , in The Art of Cervantes in Don Quixote: Critical Essays, ed. by Stephen Boyd, Trudi L. Darby and Terence O'Reilly, Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Cultures, 27 (Cambridge

Step 9. Now a colon, a space, and the publisher's name. Here that's Legenda because this is the imprint name under which the book is published, even though Legenda is not strictly speaking a company. To decide these things, one must look at the exact wording of the preliminary pages. Our preference is for Legenda books to be cited as 'Legenda', and we word our preliminaries with that aim.

Boyd, Stephen. 2019. Introduction to , in The Art of Cervantes in Don Quixote: Critical Essays, ed. by Stephen Boyd, Trudi L. Darby and Terence O'Reilly, Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Cultures, 27 (Cambridge: Legenda

Step 10. Since we had the date of first publication up front, we don't need it here, so we're done with the bracketed part.

Boyd, Stephen. 2019. Introduction to , in The Art of Cervantes in Don Quixote: Critical Essays, ed. by Stephen Boyd, Trudi L. Darby and Terence O'Reilly, Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Cultures, 27 (Cambridge: Legenda)

Step 11. Now the pagination. This is a book, so we use 'p.' or 'pp.' as appropriate. Number ranges are elided in the last two digits: thus '2234-2265' should be '2234-65', and '102-109' should be '102-09'.

Boyd, Stephen. 2019. Introduction to , in The Art of Cervantes in Don Quixote: Critical Essays, ed. by Stephen Boyd, Trudi L. Darby and Terence O'Reilly, Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Cultures, 27 (Cambridge: Legenda), pp. 1–8

And that's the finished bibliography entry. Note that there's no final full stop.

So how about citations in the main text, or in footnotes or endnotes?

The advantage of the author-date system is that these are very concise. In fact, you don't need a note at all. Suppose we quote from page 21:

The author reminds us of Shakespeare’s view: ‘Better a foolish wit than a witty fool’ (Boyd 2019: 21).

And notes are concise too. There's no difference in how to treat the first and subsequent notes.

34 Boyd 2019.

So is author-date easier than regular MHRA style? Not always. Firstly, it may not be allowed by your editor, so check before using. But secondly, it makes books easier to write, but only at the cost of making them harder to proof-read. If you discover at the last moment that Blenkinsop 1996 was actually published in 1995, that can mean hundreds of corrections to make, and it gets worse if an author has many publications in the same year, because Blenkinsop 1996e and Blenkinsop 1996d are easy to confuse.