MHRA Style Citation Demonstration

According to the MHRA Style Guide, this item should be cited in a bibliography as follows:

The Annual Bibliography of English Language and Literature 65: Survey Year 1990, The Annual Bibliography of English Language and Literature, 65 (Cambridge: MHRA)

This is in the author-date variant of MHRA style. MHRA's journals don't allow author-date citation, but some of its book series (notably Legenda) do: please talk to your editor before using this. (To see the demonstration for regular style instead, follow this link.)

Let's take this bibliography entry one step at a time:

Step 1. Here we have the book's title, in italics, not quotation marks.

The Annual Bibliography of English Language and Literature 65: Survey Year 1990

Step 2. This book belongs to a series, so we'll name that. If the series is numbered, we give the number, too. No italics, no quotation marks in the series name.

The Annual Bibliography of English Language and Literature 65: Survey Year 1990, The Annual Bibliography of English Language and Literature, 65

Step 3. Since this is a book, not a journal issue, we have to identify its source, in round brackets. First, place of publication. This can be ambiguous. MHRA now has its registered address in Cambridge, so let's give that.

The Annual Bibliography of English Language and Literature 65: Survey Year 1990, The Annual Bibliography of English Language and Literature, 65 (Cambridge

Step 4. Now a colon, a space, and the publisher's name. Abbreviating to 'MHRA' is fine here.

The Annual Bibliography of English Language and Literature 65: Survey Year 1990, The Annual Bibliography of English Language and Literature, 65 (Cambridge: MHRA

Step 5. Since we had the date of first publication up front, we don't need it here, so we're done with the bracketed part.

The Annual Bibliography of English Language and Literature 65: Survey Year 1990, The Annual Bibliography of English Language and Literature, 65 (Cambridge: MHRA)

And that's the finished bibliography entry. Note that there's no final full stop.

So how about citations in the main text, or in footnotes or endnotes?

The advantage of the author-date system is that these are very concise. In fact, you don't need a note at all. Suppose we quote from page 21:

The author reminds us of Shakespeare’s view: ‘Better a foolish wit than a witty fool’ ( 0000: 21).

And notes are concise too. There's no difference in how to treat the first and subsequent notes.

34 0000.

So is author-date easier than regular MHRA style? Not always. Firstly, it may not be allowed by your editor, so check before using. But secondly, it makes books easier to write, but only at the cost of making them harder to proof-read. If you discover at the last moment that Blenkinsop 1996 was actually published in 1995, that can mean hundreds of corrections to make, and it gets worse if an author has many publications in the same year, because Blenkinsop 1996e and Blenkinsop 1996d are easy to confuse.