![]()
| Home | ||||
| News | ||||
| About MHRA | ||||
| Membership | ||||
| Publications | ||||
| Funding | ||||
| Rights | ||||
Open Letters
|
||||
| FAQ | ||||
| Contacts | ||||
| Links | ||||
| Downloads | ||||
| Search this site | ||||
| Legal | ||||
mail@mhra.org.uk |
||||
| © MHRA 2006 | ||||
| Page updated 4 Dec. 2006 |
1 December 2006
The Modern Humanities Research Association applauds the Victoria and Albert
Museum for its recent decision to abolish reproduction fees for scholarly
use of images of its collection.
Malcolm Cook, Chairman of the MHRA, commented: "This
is a major event, opening an important archive for practical scholarly use,
and making a significant contribution to the vital debate on the social purposes
of copyright. British scholars are very often obliged to pay from their own
pockets for the rights to use images in their books. One might be charged
£500 to reproduce a painting by Rembrandt, who died in 1669, even when
the image is used for scholarly purposes in a book whose sales income will
barely cover printing costs. (A typical art history book might need 60 such
illustrations.) The process of rights clearance is not only expensive: it
is also cumbersome and legally fraught with risk. Museums very often grant
licences with terms which do not meet the needs of the book, restricting subsequent
reprints, for instance."
As the British Academy's recent report on copyright law
commented, the practice of charging rights fees for works in public hands
is a serious threat to the academic study of art and culture. We hope that
the ongoing Gowers Review into intellectual property will take note both of
the BA report and of the V&A's change in policy, and will recommend clarification
of the law in this area.
For all these reasons we welcome the V&A's decision. Over time, we believe it will substantially raise the profile of the V&A collection, and can only benefit the museum. As trustees and curators, museums must of course raise funds for buildings, staff and restoration. But rights fees can only be a significant income stream if they are priced at unreasonably steep levels, and such a practice endangers the living body of scholarship on which every great art collection depends. The highest purpose of a museum is to open its collection for all, and we hope that other great public collections will follow the V&A's lead, both in the UK and beyond.